Mathematicians vs computer scientists

There is a considerable difference between a mathematician’s view of the world
and a computer-scientist’s. To a mathematician all structures are static: they have
always been and will always be; the only time dependence is that we just haven’t
discovered them all yet. The computer scientist is concerned with (and fascinated by)
the continuous creation, combination, separation and destruction of structures: time is
of the essence. In the hands of a mathematician, the Peano axioms create the integers
without reference to time, but if a computer scientist uses them to implement integer
addition, he finds they describe a very slow process, which is why he will be looking
for a more efficient approach. In this respect the computer scientist has more in com-
mon with the physicist and the chemist; like these, he cannot do without a solid basis in
several branches of applied mathematics, but, like these, he is willing (and often virtu-
ally obliged) to take on faith certain theorems handed to him by the mathematician.
Without the rigor of mathematics all science would collapse, but not all inhabitants of a
building need to know all the spars and girders that keep it upright. Factoring off cer-
tain detailed knowledge to specialists reduces the intellectual complexity of a task,
which is one of the things computer science is about.
--"Parsing Technics"


codethat said...

Конечно же, всё правильно написано, но с другой стороны немного неправильно сравнивать CS с математикой, которая и наукой то не является, а представляет собой лишь инструмент формализации непротиворечивых суждений и лишена критерия истинности (в чём похожа на философию). Впрочем, как говорил Абельсон, CS тоже не совсем наука, но все равно более похожа на нее.

Vsevolod Dyomkin said...

@codehat Цитата приведена к тому, что, на самом деле, в программировании есть несколько групп людей, которые формируют разные взгляды на то, как оно должно развиваться, и разные парадигмы